|
|
An individual's appropriate level of comfort and proficiency with a computer should link to the business need. The standards you set should reflect what the individual's responsibilities will be in the business. I mean... Does the person have to simply be able to follow instructions and type or, on another part of the spectrum, does the person have to be able to do mail merges with Access data and Word documents? Find out what the standard ought to be for the position in question (what does the business need that person do to), then design the assessment from there.
|
| |
|
|
|
Hi Andrew (sorry I neglected a greeting on my initial response)...
I am remiss to address the literacy standard issue because I have a HUGE issue with that scale. I've always found its validity highly questionable (at best). (Was in elementary ed and a tech writer in former lives.)
I believe you are correct - there is no "standard" scale for measuring computer literacy. Even if there were... to whose standard does it fit? Much like my problem with the literacy scale and assigning grade levels to it...
In any case - if you wish to venture there, you could create a scale from common sense. For example, common sense tells me that basic literacy on a computer would be basic skills with a computer configured with current specs. That would include things like: using the mouse, keyboarding, opening and closing files, saving files and knowing how to find them again. Thing is, proficient has different meanings depending on the need. If you are testing someone who is going to be a programmer, that person's bottom-line basic skill and knowledge should be way above a typical end-user's highest level of proficiency. It's all relative. That's why I'm urging you to consider assessing "computer literacy" based on business need... and if you must create some kind of scale, I'm sure a bit of common sense will guide you.
|
| |
|