|
|
One can almost always find scholarly research (and not-so-scholarly research) to support all kinds of hypotheses. I think an important question to ask, though, is whether one's hypothesis is complete.
Sure - follow-up is one of many things that can be a factor in what helps someone retain and use what he/she learned...but ultimately, there are far more powerful, more important aspects of the design and facilitation of learning that address the stickiness of training. Follow-up is about management and coaching. If you want to talk about making training stick, you'll want to focus on who is designing, developing and facilitating it and how they are doing that. I mean to say - if you're specifically interested in improving the training itself, then follow-up is not the factor you want to look at.
Just my two cents. I hope I've given you some things to think about.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Posts: 174 | Location: US | Registered: February 04, 2008 |    |
|
|
|
I believe the Ebbinghaus Effect is the most commonly used example of this type of research. His most famous 'discovery' was referred to as the learning curve and is pretty well known now. You can find out more about him and his research here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Ebbinghaus---------------------------------- For training resources, training course materials, trainers notes, training courses, training games and many other free training tools, visit: http://www.trainerbubble.com . We now have Self-Study Workbooks!
|
| |
| Posts: 216 | Location: UK | Registered: May 14, 2007 |    |
|