ASTD Homepage    ASTD Discussion Boards  Hop To Forum Categories  Evaluation & ROI    Pre-measurement is the answer
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
Paul Kearns,

Sure, as a step in any business decision. As you know, if there are no measures you might wish to ask what the local supervisor or manager is doing lately. Who would decide these
measures? "Works Perfectly" ?

Nero Wolfe
 
Posts: 761 | Registered: 20 February 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Martin Schmalenbach
Posted Hide Post
Pre measurement, or establishing a baseline, is a crucial step to being able to measure the change in performance both during and after a programme.

Level 4 measurements are not lagging indicators per se - they are simply Level 4 measurements - an measure of the impact to the business. Choose the right measure and it can easily be a predictor of performance - a leading indicator, especially if you understand the relationship between relevant processes and their inputs and outputs. To develop this level of understanding you need several things, including a good measurement system and set of measures.


Martin Schmalenbach
Potential Energy Ltd
www.p-nrg.com
 
Posts: 98 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 02 September 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Once we have the change to the business measurement we are tracking (pre-post measurement), we need to be sure to separate the variables. That is, we can only attribute to training that part of the change that is a result of the training. Phillips calls this isolating the effects of training. There are always other factors that need to be taken into consideration.
 
Posts: 21 | Registered: 07 February 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Phillips starts in the wrong place - that's why he tries to 'convert' afterwards and isolate variables. Both of these activities are pointless. Pre-measurement follows the well established principle of Plan Do Check Act - isolating variables is unnecessary if the planned measures improve.
 
Posts: 16 | Location: UK | Registered: 02 March 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Vlad the Impaler
Posted Hide Post
quote:
isolating variables is unnecessary if the planned measures improve.


There's an example from ICL which Thomas Stewart cites (albeit in relation to IC) which backs up your point "it almost doesn't matter what the bloody metrics are, so long as you can know that this thing, whatever it is, is getting better or worse. If you don't keep your intellectual capital refreshed, it will erode."

Metrics good....more and more attention to metrics better? I wonder how practical it is to make the intangible tangible? Strikes me as more of an oxymoron!


"Critical thinking is a lived activity, not an abstract academic pastime" (Stephen Brookfield)
 
Posts: 134 | Registered: 19 February 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  

Closed Topic Closed

ASTD Homepage    ASTD Discussion Boards  Hop To Forum Categories  Evaluation & ROI    Pre-measurement is the answer

© American Society for Training & Development (ASTD)
Linking People, Learning and Performance
Terms and Conditions
1640 King Street, Box 1443 . Alexandria, Virginia, 22313-2043, USA
Phone: 703.683.8100 . Fax: 703.683.8103